By Wang Wenwen
VIOLENCE, guns. These are often fixtures of elections in underdeveloped or developing countries. What is happeningduring the US election is something that we could have never imaged in this “Beacon of Freedom.”
The US is considered a model of democracy, and one characteristic of democracy is: “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” Democracy is exercised in a civilized and graceful manner. The one who loses in elections is supposed to stay cool, accept the result, and call for bridging differences to move the country forward. But it seems that this does not exist in the US nowadays.
In the past four years, we have witnessed how a divided US becomes even more divided. Two years ago when I went to the US to cover the mid-term elections, I clearly felt partisan division, but the social atmosphere was restrained and controllable. But this year’s general election is totally different.
Ahead of the elections, the Americans went panic-buying, with many industries experiencing product delays and shortages. There has been a surge of new gun owners, looking to arm themselves in the event of a turbulent election aftermath. Gun sales in the US have hit a record this year, with 1.7 million in October. Meanwhile, businesses in major cities across the US have boarded up windows and doors for fear of election unrest. Crowds violently clashed outside the White House on election night as thousands of protesters gathered. Over 3,000 National Guard troops have been activated in various states for fear of violence. It remains to be seen how the “civil war” evolves as a result of the election.
The US stands on the high political and moral ground among developed Western countries. In an election of such a country as the US, what was uncertain in the past was the result of the election, while the election process would always remain certain. Disputes, chaos and the refusal of election results by certain candidates were supposed to take place in developing countries where political conditions were not stable, and definitely not in a country like the US.
But things have changed – all these have occurred in the US, and the US is not synonymous to a stable, civilized and consensus-based society anymore.
The US has been keen on dividing other societies in countries it sees as rivals. It is an old hand in launching “color revolutions” which have spread from Eastern Europe to Central Asia. Ironically, US society has to face such a division in itself.
– The Daily Mail-Global
Times news exchange item
