After Justice Naqvi, Justice Ahsan resigns as SC Judge

By Anzal Amin

ISLAMABAD: In a surprising turn of events, Justice Ijazul Ahsan of the Supreme Court of Pakistan has tendered his resignation, stepping down from his judicial duties.
According to sources, Justice Ahsan has submitted his written resignation to President Dr Arif Alvi.
He was slated to become the next chief justice of Pakistan following incumbent CJP Qazi Faez Isa’s re-tirement in October this year.
“I have had the honour and privilege of serving as a Judge of the Lahore High Court, the Chief Justice of the Lahore High Court and a Judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan,” Justice Ahsan wrote in his resignation, a copy of which is available with The Express Tribune.
The top judge said that he no longer wished to continue as a judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan.
“Therefore, I, Justice Ijaz ul Ahsan, resign as a Judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in terms of Arti-cle 206(1) of the Constitution with immediate effect,” he further said.
The development comes a day after Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi – who faces charges of misconduct –resigned as a judge of the Supreme Court, saying it was no longer possible for him to con-tinue holding this position.
Justice Naqvi is accused of misconduct and embroiled in ongoing proceedings at the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) in this connection. His resignation was accepted by the president earlier in the day.
On Tuesday, Justice Ijazul Ahsan raised concerns about the manner in which the SJC is conducting pro-ceedings on complaints filed against another SC judge Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi. Justice Ahsan had called for the withdrawal of the show cause notice issued to Justice Naqvi on No-vember 22.
The senior judge issued his 4-page opinion highlighting the reasons why he disagreed with the majori-ty verdict to issue show cause notices to Naqvi.
“Before I set out my reasons, I wish to say something about the manner in which these [SJC] proceed-ings are being conducted. Unfortunately, in my opinion, proceedings are being conducted in undue haste contrary to established norms,” he said.
According to the judge, the council, entrusted as it is with enormous constitutional responsibilities un-der Article 209 of the Constitution, is a body that must act with deliberate care and after full, frank and detailed discussion. “This is especially so where there is no unanimity and some members (or even one member) are inclined to disagree with [the] majority. This approach has been entirely lacking in the present proceedings. Debate and discussion has been non-existent and has not been permitted.”
Justice Ahsan also said the SJC proceedings on November 22, 2023, when it issued the second notice to Justice Naqvi, were completely devoid of any discussion or deliberation whatsoever. This manner of proceedings, he said, has cast an unwelcome doubt over the whole process. “I, therefore, disagree with the process followed and the manner in which the proceedings are being conducted,” he added.
In June 2016, Justice Ahsan assumed the role of a Supreme Court judge. Currently, he was number three on seniority list.
Following his resignation, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah is poised to ascend to the position of chief justice later this year, as he has become the senior most SC judge.
Earlier in the day, Justice Ahsan had recused himself from attending the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) meeting. Chairman Qazi Faiz Isa presided over the session, with Justice Sardar Tariq Masood, Chief Jus-tice of Balochistan High Court, and the Chief Justice of Lahore High Court participating as members. Notably, Justice Ahsan chose not to be part of the meeting.
During the proceedings, no legal representative for Justice Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi was present. The Chief Justice of Pakistan instructed the Attorney General to read out Justice Naqvi’s resignation.
The chief justice briefly halted the council’s proceedings, acknowledging the absence of Justice Ijazul Ahsan. He announced that Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, the senior judge, would be consulted regarding his availability. If Justice Shah is present, the council’s actions will proceed accordingly.
Following the break, the meeting resumed with Justice Mansoor Ali Shah joining as a council member under the chairmanship of the Judicial Council.