China takes cat lives more seriously than some Western countries treat Covid patients

he decision of local authorities in Harbin, Northeast China’s Heilongjiang Province, to euthanize three pet cats that tested positive for COVID-19 has aroused controversy. Unsurprisingly, some US media outlets and Western users on social media platforms like Twitter have taken the chance to attack China. They blasted the decision as an act of cruelty against life and a result of China’s “fear-mongering about COVID-19.”
China is being criticized for cruel treatment on life because of putting down three virus-infected cats – are they serious? The US’ COVID-19 death toll now has neared 700,000, surpassing the figure of the devastating 1918 flu pandemic. Given such a botched anti-pandemic situation, those Westerners are in no position to preach China about how to treat life.
In China, animal rights activists have also criticized the decision. They called for health authorities to offer a more ethical and standardized way to treat virus-infected animals. But the majority of the Chinese people believe euthanizing the cats is a necessary decision in line with the law for the sake of epidemic prevention and control. The epidemic prevention and control staff members are believed to have fully assessed the risks of virus transmission and adopted the most necessary method.
The end-of-life decision is backed up by Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Prevention and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, which stipulates that when an infectious disease breaks out, infected wild animals and domestic animals can be controlled or killed if necessary.
Feng Zijian, deputy director general of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, said in an interview with The Beijing News on Tuesday that there was little experience in dealing with infected animals and that if a cat continuously carries a virus, the risks of transmission exist and great caution is needed to deal with it. He stressed that should a cat repeatedly test positive for COVID-19, it has to be put down. Moreover, it’s also noticeable that as the pandemic rages on worldwide, cases that infected animals such as tigers, cats and dogs are euthanized in other countries have been not uncommon.
“From the perspective of public health crisis management and control, euthanizing the three cats is a decisive measure to minimize negative effects and avoid worst results,” Shen Yi, a professor at Shanghai-based Fudan University, told the Global Times. “If cat-to-human transmission really happens and a spread within the community breaks out, will those critics bear the responsibility at that time? And how can they afford that?” Shen asked. With the approaching of the week-long National Day holidays, the huge flow of people during the period is bringing great challenges to the epidemic prevention and control. Cities like Harbin where local new cases are still reported are facing an arduous task in effectively controlling and reducing the risk of the virus spread. The decision of the epidemic prevention and control staff to put down the cats has shown their responsible attitude toward the safety of people’s lives. The owner of the cats, a COVID-19 patient, is receiving treatment in hospital. Her sadness is understandable. From her posts on Weibo, we can learn that the three cats were well taken care of by community workers before they were found to be virus carriers.
– The Daily Mail-Global Times News exchange item