DM Monitoring
BEIJING: A spokesperson of Chinese Foreign Ministry Hua Chunying reiterated that China’s diplomacy represents and defends the interests and dignity of the 1.4 billion Chinese people, or one fifth of the world’s population.
Speaking here a news briefing, she said on major issues of principle that bear on China’s sovereignty, security, development interests and international fairness and justice, China’s diplomacy must resolutely and forcefully fight back all malicious provocations, vigorously defend national interests and dignity, and safeguard international fairness and justice.
She stressed that China has always adhered to an independent foreign policy of peace. Aggressiveness is not our tradition, neither is bending our knee. In the face of hegemony and bullying, Mao Zedong once said, “We will not attack unless we are attacked, if we are attacked, we will certainly counterattack.”
The spokesperson added, ” China does not provoke trouble, but will never flinch when trouble comes their way. We will not yield to coercion and blackmailing.
If some people call China’s diplomacy “wolf-warrior diplomacy” just because we fight back and speak the truth in the face of unscrupulous attacks, slanders and denigration, she did not see any problem in living with that “wolf-warrior” title, as long as we are fighting for China’s sovereignty, security and development interests, national dignity and honor, and international fairness and justice.
The spokesperson further noted that German newspaper misspelled “权 (power)” as “杈(pitchfork)”, which was ridiculed by the Chinese media. But such goof doesn’t surprise me at all, because there are some people who like to harp at China and criticize China as if they were China experts, when in fact, they know nothing about China.
As for “wolf-warrior diplomacy”, she would like to ask those who accuse China of “wolf-warrior diplomacy”: have they ever watched Disney’s animated film The Lion King?
” What do they think of that lovely little lion, Simba, who has grown up with all the suspicion, blame, and hardships as company?
If you may recall those things that happened between China and some other countries in recent period of time, which time and which one was caused by China’s provocation in the first place? Which time and in which case was China interfering in other countries’ internal affairs? Which time and in which case was China threatening or damaging the interests of other countries? Whether it is labeling the virus, politicizing the epidemic, stigmatizing China, or abusing the concept of national security to arbitrarily suppress Chinese enterprises and undermine normal people-to-people and cultural exchanges, economic, trade and scientific cooperation; whether it is interfering in China’s internal affairs under the pretext of the so-called human rights, democracy, freedom, or defying basic norms of international relations, viciously attacking China’s political system and imposing wantonly unilateral sanctions, how can anyone think China has no right to speak the truth while they have every right to slander, attack, smear and hurt China?
Do they think that China, as a sovereign state, doesn’t have the right to safeguard its own sovereignty, security, development interests and national dignity and honor, while every citizen has the right to exercise justifiable defense in accordance with the law?
Do they think that China has no choice but the silence of the lambs while they are unscrupulously lashing out at the country with trumped-up charges?
